According to reports in the Canadian Press and Associated Press, the International Joint Commission (IJC) has expressed "disappointment and frustration" to the U.S. and Canadian governments over the lack of progress under Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA).
It's been more than 20 years since the last update to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, and despite mounting evidence that some problems are at the point of no return, there seems to be little sense of urgency to save the "binational treasure," said Herb Gray, a former deputy prime minister and Canadian chairman of the International Joint Commission.
The comments come among a flurry of bad press surrounding the IJC. In January Great Lakes United released its report "A Way Forward" which was critical of progress under the GLWQA and of the IJC.
Unfortunately, there is currently a strong and near unanimous opinion that the IJC is not adequately fulfilling its responsibilities.
The full report (PDF) goes on to provide a succinct summary of the history behind the IJC's current challenges. The conclusion is right on the money.
When speaking out strongly on behalf of the Great Lakes, the public profile of the IJC among the broad Great Lakes community and the media grew, but the governments stepped back from the IJC and increasingly questioned the credibility of its recommendations
because it had become too much of an advocate. And conversely, when the IJC stepped back from this leadership role, many in the Great Lakes community and the media became less engaged with IJC processes as they saw their involvement as unproductive and, as a result, not worth their time.
Then in recent weeks there has been a storm of protest over the refusal of the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) to release a report, commissioned by the IJC, entitled "Public Health Implications of Hazardous Substances in the Twenty-Six U.S. Great Lakes Areas of Concern". The suppression of the report was first reported by the Center for Public Integrity, and it has since been widely reported that it was suppressed for political reasons.
So I suspect the IJC is speaking out now to counter some of this bad publicity, and, to be fair, out of genuine frustration. After all, a report it released in late 2006 recommended significant changes to the GLWQA which have been largely ignored. In recent testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, Irene Brooks, acting U.S. chair of the IJC highlighted the lack of progress in addressing the toxic legacy of the Areas of Concern. In general she concluded:
The future of the Great Lakes is uncertain. That’s why the Commission believes the time has come to make bold binational commitments and to accelerate actions to restore and protect the Great Lakes.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored by:
_______________________________________________________________________________________